
Forging and Other Processes
What is "grain flow"?
I've heard "grain flow" mentioned on several occasions when
discussing forgings. What exactly is "grain flow" and what
does it do (or not do) for me.
  Forgings
are produced using the open-die forging process through
the controlled application of compressive stresses while
the metal is heated in the plastic regime. The metal, once
subjected to the compressive stress, will expand in two
other directions unless constrained in either direction.
The expanding metal will stretch the existing grains and,
if the temperature is within the forging temperature region,
will recrystalize and form new strain free grains. The formation
of the new grains is not random, however. The new crystal
structure is oriented along the direction of the metal flow
and can be used to enhance the properties of the forged
component by producing a forging that closely follows the
outline of the component resulting in even better resistance
to fatigue and stress corrosion than a forging that does
not contour the component. Other contributors to grain flow
are the expansion of microsegregated regions and/or inclusions
in the direction of the metal flow. The effect of the elongated
microsegregated regions and/or inclusions can be controlled
through the use of high quality material and due attention
to the forging technique.
 What are the benefits of a seamless hollow-core forging?
What are the benefits, with respect to residual stresses,
of a seamless hollow-core forging over rolled and welded
plate that is subsequently processed (machining, heat treating,
etc.)?
In general, distortion of a component will occur when the
stress states of either the individual components or the
assembly as a whole shift from one state of equilibrium
to a new equilibrium state. The presence of residual stresses
in the components act as a source of potential energy similar
in nature to a spring fixed in a compressed state. If the
fixture holding the spring remains intact, the spring does
not expand. However, once the fixture is removed, the spring
expands until it reaches a new state of equilibrium; either
another fixed point or a point where the potential energy
of the spring is expended and the spring is extended. So
too will the potential energy in a component due to residual
stress remain unchanged until the equilibrium state is altered;
either through mechanical means (metal removal or cold/warm
straightening, etc.) or thermal means (welding, heat treatment,
etc.).
|
|
|
Rolled and welded hollow |
|
|
|
Forged Hollow |
Using this model, it is apparent that the key to minimizing
distortion is to select a fabrication process that (1) uses
input material with little or no residual stress and (2)
will permit a subsequent processing path that introduces
as little residual stress as possible. To form a plate into
a cylinder will, in most cases, necessarily require stretching
the metal beyond its yield point to both hold the cylindrical
shape and allow for the subsequent spring-back. If it is
assumed that the starting plate is essentially free of residual
stress due to processing at elevated temperatures (a large
assumption indeed), the equilibrium state of the plate is
subsequently changed during rolling through the introduction
of tensile and compressive stresses that shift the equilibrium
state to that of a cylindrical shape (requiring a weld to
hold it in place because of the tendency to spring back,
in particular with materials having a high yield strength).
Understanding the proportional relationship between stress
and strain (elastic modulus - ironically sometimes referred
to as the spring constant) it can be intuitively understood
that the stretching will spring back to a new state that
now has residual stress present. In addition, the introduction
of the longitudinal weldment to complete the cylindrical
shape further disrupts the system through the introduction
of thermal energy. The severity of the residual stress will
increase with increases in either, or all, of the yield
strength of the base metal, circumference of the tube, and
plate thickness. Once the desired shape is achieved, it
will remain in that shape as long as no subsequent processing
or service conditions that alters the stress state is performed
(machining or welding for example). When the part does distort,
additional mechanical work is required to revive the desired
shape resulting in an often "circular" manufacturing path.
These costs are sometimes (often?) not considered when selecting
a rolled and welded cylinder.
Consider, now, a seamless hollow-core Scot Forge forging
that is forged at elevated temperatures with dynamic recrystallization
(the immediate formation of stress-free grains upon deformation).
The stresses introduced during forging to produce the cylindrical
shape are immediately removed through the recrystallization
of the crystal structure resulting in an essentially stress-free
forging. Consequently, a rolled and welded assembly possesses
significantly higher residual stress than a forged seamless
cylinder (hollow-core). Furthermore, no thermal stresses
from welding are introduced during formation of the cylinder
as a seamless forged hollow-core, unlike the rolled and
welded plate method. To summarize, the Scot Forge seamless
hollow core forging is far more stable and possesses a higher
degree of structural integrity (no welds!) than a rolled
and welded cylinder assembly for an often lower overall
cost.
 |
|
What is the optimum reduction needed for forging? |
 |
Forging reduction should be sufficient to consolidate the defects
inherent to the casting process such as porosity and
other voids while achieving a general wrought structure
by breaking down the cast structure. A 3 to 1 reduction
is usually sufficient to achieve these results. Depending
on the alloy and customer requirements, higher reduction
may be to necessary to achieve certain additional mechanical
or physical requirements. |

 What
is the ASTM standard for ultrasonic testing of forgings?
Is there a similar standard to ASTM 578 (ultrasonic testing
for plate) for forgings?
The most common ultrasonic standard practice for forgings
is ASTM A388, Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Examination
of Heavy Steel Forgings. Unlike ASTM A578, this standard
does not include acceptance criteria so I would suggest
using ASTM A788, Supplementary requirement s20, for starters.
You can find the current revision of ASTM Standards at the
following link: http://www.astm.org/cgibin/SoftCart.exe/STORE/standardsearch.shtml
?L+mystore+radl5786+1019794827.
Disclaimer: Although the
information set forth herein is believed to be correct,
Scot Forge makes no recommendation, or offers no warranty
of any kind with respect to the subject matter or
its accuracy. Scot Forge specifically disclaims all
warranties, expressed, implied, or otherwise, including
without limitation, all warranties of merchantability,
fitness, or suitability for a particular purpose or
application. |
|
|
|